Build a digital product that helps users recover source material and missing context behind digital content, so they can better understand it and reach their own conclusions.
Registration closes February 28, 2027.
Registration October 1, 2026 to February 28, 2027.
Register, find teammates and form your team on ConneXions
A thirty-second clip from a two-hour hearing. A headline shared without the article. A statistic that sounds convincing, but has no source attached. The full story is usually out there. The problem is finding it. Sometimes that means opening a dozen tabs, chasing links, and spending twenty minutes just to track down where something came from. By then, the moment has passed.
So most people move on. Not because they do not care about the context, but because finding it takes too much effort. What if getting back to the source was as easy as finding the fragment in the first place? Give people a simple way to see where a clip, claim, or statistic came from, and let them decide what it means.

of U.S. teens say they were misled by content that was real but presented misleadingly.
ITU, Measuring Digital Development: Facts and Figures 2024 → Link
of the news influencers sampled have no newsroom or journalism background
Pew Research Center / Pew-Knight Initiative, America's News Influencers, November 2024 → Link
of people now say they avoid the news, a record high and up from 29% in 2017
Reuters Institute, Digital News Report 2025, June 2025 → Link
Build a private, user-controlled digital product for college-age users. Help them recover original material, inspect the evidence and understand what a fragment leaves out.
Find the original source, full quote or clip, date, speaker, and the material around it.
See who is speaking, where the material came from, and any relevant credentials or sponsorship, presented as information rather than as a verdict.
See what other relevant sources report, where they agree or differ, and what none of them cover.
Get clear explanations of loaded or technical terms, with the sources behind them, and where definitions differ.
Point users to the original document, full recording, or reporting that gets them closer to the source.
Give people evidence they can inspect and room to decide. No rating, no verdict, no score in place of their judgment.
There isn't one right answer. The approach is up to each team. Start with a focused use case, accessible sources, and a clear reason people would come back. Here are a few directions to explore:
Let users pull up the source and missing context while they read on a supported site.
Give users a fast, private way to bring a post or link into your product from the app they are already in.
Use models to retrieve, match or explain source material, and measure their errors, limits and cost.
Build a digital product backed by human research or review. Account for the time, cost, privacy and operating demands of that work in your economics.
Connect a clip to the fuller recording, transcript or original, and explain uncertain matches.



A strong idea isn't enough. You’ll need to show that your product works for real people, handles context responsibly, and has a path beyond the competition.
Show that people use it voluntarily, come back months later, and prefer it to whatever they would otherwise do.
Correct matches, honest limitations, comparable claims, and disclosed gaps.
Demonstrate real paid demand and a full accounting of what it costs to run: people, models, retrieval, source access, support.
Design for privacy and safety, and show the product performs under real conditions, including what happens when a source is missing or an output is wrong.
The best ideas rarely come from one perspective. Build a team of 3–6 students from at least three academic disciplines, bringing different skills, questions, and ways of seeing the problem.
Build it, test it, and figure out what’s possible.
Spot the opportunity, shape the business, and turn ideas into action.
Bring creativity, communication, performance, design, or a different way of seeing the problem.
Understand people, tell the story, and make something they want to use.
Ask good questions, test assumptions, and follow the evidence.
This is not a simulation of startup work. Your team will build a digital product, put it in front of real users, test demand over a measured evaluation window and defend its decisions to a judging panel with an investor in the room.
Go from an idea to a working product in production. Test it with users under the program's research and deployment requirements, then improve it with evidence.
Leave with a record of what you did: research, design decisions, technical work, user learning and commercial evidence.
Work across disciplines the way real companies do. Journalism, computer science, design, business, policy, psychology and information science all have obvious roles here.
Xponential Venture Fund proposes a $1,000,000 SAFE investment in one qualifying winning team's company. This is not a cash prize and not a signed funding commitment.
Show that you understand the problem and the people experiencing it.
Commit to the product thesis you're going to test.
Ship something people can actually use.
Put it in the world. Watch what happens. Learn from real usage.
Show what you built, what the evidence says, and what should happen next.
Late entrants share these dates. All missed gates submited together with next gate.
Don't have a team? Register anyway. ConneXions is where teams form.

You get access to ConneXions, where you can find teammates across disciplines and read the competition overview. You are not signing anything. The Official Rules, the Mission Plan and the participation agreements are published by November 30, 2026, and the serious build starts then.
No. The product must be digital, but it can use human assistance, AI assistance or both. Every approach meets the same product, evidence, privacy and safety requirements, and your development and operating costs count in the business case.
The Mission Plan, program guidance, mentor matching and access to technical, research and venture resources. Some members of the Horizons Council, the journalists and educators who advised on the design, may choose to mentor. No specific mentor, customer, partner or investment is promised.
Yes. The topic is your choice and no permission is required. xFoundry recommends caution with polarizing or fast-moving topics: sources move fast and cost more to keep current, mistakes cost more, and demand can vanish after the event. A short-lived market can still be a good business if you know it is short-lived. Answer those questions in your business plan.
Your product leaves conclusions to the user. It does not decide contested claims, rank creators or outlets, assign political lean or quietly filter sources to remove bias. It shows relevant perspectives and the evidence behind them without treating every disagreement as an even split.
Individualized medical, legal or investment advice is prohibited. Explaining a source is different from telling a person what to do, and a disclaimer does not change that.
Products are private and user-controlled: no ad-supported model, no sale of usage data, no training-data resale, no biometrics, no device fingerprinting, and no individual usage reports to universities or employers. First-cycle users and research participants are adults.
Complete the four gates and the non-curable milestones, break no hard rule, and meet the Schedule A standard: 20 percent of your activated users still using the product four months later, measured on a cohort of at least 100 activated users, plus paid demand of either at least $1,000 in cumulative recognized revenue from at least 50 distinct paying users, with at least half of those payers retained at four months under the published payer rule, or at least one paid institutional or adult-family pilot of at least $5,000, with a named buyer and written scope. A letter of intent supports your case but cannot qualify you. Among qualifying teams, the judging panel scores the seven criteria above. If no team meets the standard, no winner is named.
You do. xFoundry claims no ownership of team-built IP. Your university, employer or prior agreements may have a say, so check early. Before any investment closes, your company must hold the rights to the product.
No. Sharing is one moment when context matters. Your product can help people understand something privately or make any other decision, without asking them to post anything.
An advisory Horizons Council of journalists and educators reviewed the design; xFoundry makes all program decisions.